This is a read-only copy of the discussions. To view the original, where you can reply, go here. For info on how to log in, please see the instructions.
|
|
Validating on ISC/UATP Amount in BM
According to the comments in IS-IDEC record structure SFI33 element21, ‘Should be equal to ISC% Allowed * Gross Amount Billed/Credited / 100 rounded to two decimal places’, in many circumstance, Billing Entity aims to debit a ISC/UATP AMT without other AMT in BM record. Therefore, it is not satisfied with this balance. Is it enforced to fail validating? |
 |
Hi,
The ISC amount cannot exist without the Gross Amount being specified. This formula forces the carriers to follow this rule.If this formula is violated, it will result in validation failure.
Best Regards
From:
Posted: Monday, January 10, 2011 11:05 PM
Subject: Validating on ISC/UATP Amount in BM
According to the comments in IS-IDEC record structure SFI33 element21, ‘Should be equal to ISC% Allowed * Gross Amount Billed/Credited / 100 rounded to two decimal places’, in many circumstance, Billing Entity aims to debit a ISC/UATP AMT without other AMT in BM record. Therefore, it is not satisfied with this balance. Is it enforced to fail validating? |