Skip to main content

Test Home
You & IATA

Search

You are here: Home » Services » Financial Services » Simplified Interline Settlement » SIS Forums
  • Print this page
  • Share this page

Change in ISPG v3.1 relate to CM

This is a read-only copy of the discussions. To view the original, where you can reply, go here. For info on how to log in, please see the instructions.

Created by Wang Q on 2011-02-09 22:20:30 Back to Topics

Change in ISPG v3.1 relate to CM

Hi
 
As the ISPG v3.1 mentioned, all CM record and CM couponbreakdown record would use the contrary sign comparing with the former version. However, we also find there was no change on source code record and invoice total record. Does it mean when we raise one CM, the net total sign would be minus in CM record, but the net total sign would be plus in SC record as well as invoice total record?
Additional, we find there is some difference in IS-IDEC structure  between excel format and pdf format. eg: SFI40 element24/25
 
TKS
Replied by Ashley H on 2011-02-21 13:30:24
This has been fixed in ISPG Release 3.1.
 
The transaction record, Source code total record, as well as Invoice total record will need to show minus sign in the Net Total amount fields in case of a Credit Memo.

From:
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2011 9:08 PM
Subject: Change in ISPG v3.1 relate to CM

Hi
 
As the ISPG v3.1 mentioned, all CM record and CM couponbreakdown record would use the contrary sign comparing with the former version. However, we also find there was no change on source code record and invoice total record. Does it mean when we raise one CM, the net total sign would be minus in CM record, but the net total sign would be plus in SC record as well as invoice total record?
Additional, we find there is some difference in IS-IDEC structure  between excel format and pdf format. eg: SFI40 element24/25
 
TKS
 
ADVERTISEMENT


Additional information

© International Air Transport Association (IATA) 2014. All rights reserved.