This is a read-only copy of the discussions. To view the original, where you can reply, go here. For info on how to log in, please see the instructions.
|
|
RM Coupon Tax Brkdwn
Hi Ashley, I've asked this question in the Record Structures section but it hasn't been answered - perhaps I had it in the wrong section, so I'm just reposting here - apologies.
This question relates to the PAX RM Coupon Brkdwn Record:
Element 21, 23 and 26 (tax billed/accepted/diff) all state that if they are populated with a non-zero value then a Tax breakdown record to is be provided.
However, if the coupon is not rejected for tax, the billed and accepted values will be the same - does this not mean that if a coupon is not rejected for tax reasons, then a coupon tax breakdown record is not required?? Should the rule be that if the "Tax Amount Difference" is a non-zero value, then a tax breakdown record should be provided?
Any clarification would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Michael. |
 |
Hi Michael,
Please find the answer to your question in the Record Structures discussion board, under the post RM Coupon Tax Brkdwn.
Kind regards
From:
Posted: Thursday, June 09, 2011 7:52 AM
Subject: RM Coupon Tax Brkdwn
Hi Ashley, I've asked this question in the Record Structures section but it hasn't been answered - perhaps I had it in the wrong section, so I'm just reposting here - apologies.
This question relates to the PAX RM Coupon Brkdwn Record:
Element 21, 23 and 26 (tax billed/accepted/diff) all state that if they are populated with a non-zero value then a Tax breakdown record to is be provided.
However, if the coupon is not rejected for tax, the billed and accepted values will be the same - does this not mean that if a coupon is not rejected for tax reasons, then a coupon tax breakdown record is not required?? Should the rule be that if the "Tax Amount Difference" is a non-zero value, then a tax breakdown record should be provided?
Any clarification would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Michael. |