SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
This is a read-only copy of the discussions. To view the original, where you can reply, go here. For info on how to log in, please see the instructions.
|
|
SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
A non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-WEB. Is it possible for a vendor to reject on behalf of that entity directly via IS or will the entity need to reject manually via IS-WEB? In other words, if an entity has not migrated for a billing category, can a vendor reject directly to IS or is it mandatory to use IS-WEB since they have not migrated for the billing category?
Thanks,
Michael. |
 |
Hi Michael,
It is correct that a non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-Web. I am not clear on what you mean by the vendor rejecting on behalf of the entity "directly via IS". If by this you mean using IS-XML for rejections, then this is not allowed - as it implies that Rejections are migrated before Primes.
Please also refer to the ISPG 3.2, Section 11.3.3/Migration Process for more information on migrating transaction types.
If my assumption on your query is erroneous, please do not hesitate to clarify and I will be happy to provide a further reply.
Best regards
From:
Posted: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:40 AM
Subject: SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
A non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-WEB. Is it possible for a vendor to reject on behalf of that entity directly via IS or will the entity need to reject manually via IS-WEB? In other words, if an entity has not migrated for a billing category, can a vendor reject directly to IS or is it mandatory to use IS-WEB since they have not migrated for the billing category?
Thanks,
Michael. |
|
Hi Ashley,
Let's assume an entity has migrated Prime billings but not Rejections. They are then billed via IS meaning they must reject via IS-WEB. Is it mandatory for IS-WEB to be used in response or can a vendor submit Rejections via IS-IDEC or IS-XML on their behalf? Such a scenario is not specified in the ISPG as far as I can see. Hope that clarifies the question.
Thanks,
Michael.
From:
Posted: Monday, May 30, 2011 1:41 PM
Subject: SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
Hi Michael,
It is correct that a non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-Web. I am not clear on what you mean by the vendor rejecting on behalf of the entity "directly via IS". If by this you mean using IS-XML for rejections, then this is not allowed - as it implies that Rejections are migrated before Primes.
Please also refer to the ISPG 3.2, Section 11.3.3/Migration Process for more information on migrating transaction types.
If my assumption on your query is erroneous, please do not hesitate to clarify and I will be happy to provide a further reply.
Best regards
From:
Posted: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:40 AM
Subject: SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
A non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-WEB. Is it possible for a vendor to reject on behalf of that entity directly via IS or will the entity need to reject manually via IS-WEB? In other words, if an entity has not migrated for a billing category, can a vendor reject directly to IS or is it mandatory to use IS-WEB since they have not migrated for the billing category?
Thanks,
Michael. |
|
Hi Michael,
This is an interesting query and we are currently discussing this topic. Please give me a few more days to get back to you with an answer.
Kind regards
From:
Posted: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:27 AM
Subject: SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
Hi Ashley,
Let's assume an entity has migrated Prime billings but not Rejections. They are then billed via IS meaning they must reject via IS-WEB. Is it mandatory for IS-WEB to be used in response or can a vendor submit Rejections via IS-IDEC or IS-XML on their behalf? Such a scenario is not specified in the ISPG as far as I can see. Hope that clarifies the question.
Thanks,
Michael.
From:
Posted: Monday, May 30, 2011 1:41 PM
Subject: SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
Hi Michael,
It is correct that a non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-Web. I am not clear on what you mean by the vendor rejecting on behalf of the entity "directly via IS". If by this you mean using IS-XML for rejections, then this is not allowed - as it implies that Rejections are migrated before Primes.
Please also refer to the ISPG 3.2, Section 11.3.3/Migration Process for more information on migrating transaction types.
If my assumption on your query is erroneous, please do not hesitate to clarify and I will be happy to provide a further reply.
Best regards
From:
Posted: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:40 AM
Subject: SIS rejection for non-migrated entity?
A non-migrated entity who is billed via IS must reject via IS-WEB. Is it possible for a vendor to reject on behalf of that entity directly via IS or will the entity need to reject manually via IS-WEB? In other words, if an entity has not migrated for a billing category, can a vendor reject directly to IS or is it mandatory to use IS-WEB since they have not migrated for the billing category?
Thanks,
Michael. |
|
|
|
|