This is a read-only copy of the discussions. To view the original, where you can reply, go here. For info on how to log in, please see the instructions.
|
|
RJM AWB breakdown record - incorrect ORI/DES entry
Dear all,
we need your answer for the following IS-IDEC issue:
SFI 26 (RJM AWB breakdown record) has element 15/16 (from/to) with validation that these must be equal to the from/to in the original AWB billing. As these fields are mandatory we have to populate them accordingly. Assuming the originally billing carrier knows the flight details best, we can follow the validation logic.
Element 13/14 (origin/destination) are optional but in case they are used, they also have the validation that these must be equal to the original AWB billing.
Assuming origin/destination of the originally billing carrier were incorrect based on our sales information how can we correct this detail? If we fill the fields with the adjusted values, the validation will fail. It cannot be the intention of SIS to leave these fields blank in this case and put the information in the remarks section.
Please advise. Gudrun (LCAG) |
 |
Dear IATA,
we are still waiting for a response as the process is not clear.
Kind regards, Gudrun (LCAG)
From:
Posted: 5/10/2012 10:55 AM
Subject: RJM AWB breakdown record - incorrect ORI/DES entry
Dear all,
we need your answer for the following IS-IDEC issue:
SFI 26 (RJM AWB breakdown record) has element 15/16 (from/to) with validation that these must be equal to the from/to in the original AWB billing. As these fields are mandatory we have to populate them accordingly. Assuming the originally billing carrier knows the flight details best, we can follow the validation logic.
Element 13/14 (origin/destination) are optional but in case they are used, they also have the validation that these must be equal to the original AWB billing.
Assuming origin/destination of the originally billing carrier were incorrect based on our sales information how can we correct this detail? If we fill the fields with the adjusted values, the validation will fail. It cannot be the intention of SIS to leave these fields blank in this case and put the information in the remarks section.
Please advise. Gudrun (LCAG) |
|
Hello again,
please give us an answer after this time of waiting for response.
Thank you and regards,
Gudrun
From:
Posted: 5/31/2012 7:28 AM
Subject: RJM AWB breakdown record - incorrect ORI/DES entry
Dear IATA,
we are still waiting for a response as the process is not clear.
Kind regards, Gudrun (LCAG)
From:
Posted: 5/10/2012 10:55 AM
Subject: RJM AWB breakdown record - incorrect ORI/DES entry
Dear all,
we need your answer for the following IS-IDEC issue:
SFI 26 (RJM AWB breakdown record) has element 15/16 (from/to) with validation that these must be equal to the from/to in the original AWB billing. As these fields are mandatory we have to populate them accordingly. Assuming the originally billing carrier knows the flight details best, we can follow the validation logic.
Element 13/14 (origin/destination) are optional but in case they are used, they also have the validation that these must be equal to the original AWB billing.
Assuming origin/destination of the originally billing carrier were incorrect based on our sales information how can we correct this detail? If we fill the fields with the adjusted values, the validation will fail. It cannot be the intention of SIS to leave these fields blank in this case and put the information in the remarks section.
Please advise. Gudrun (LCAG) |
|
Dear Gudrun, Sorry for the delay in responding to your question. In SFI 26, Element 13/14 we mention in the comments field (not in the validation field) that “these must be equal to the original AWB billing”. So even if you make a change to the ORI/DES, SIS will not flag it as an error. Hope that clarifies. Regards, Ashley From: Gudrun Gewert
Posted At: May-10-12 10:55 AM
Posted To: SIS Forums - Record Structures
Conversation: RJM AWB breakdown record - incorrect ORI/DES entry
Subject: RJM AWB breakdown record - incorrect ORI/DES entry we need your answer for the following IS-IDEC issue: SFI 26 (RJM AWB breakdown record) has element 15/16 (from/to) with validation that these must be equal to the from/to in the original AWB billing. As these fields are mandatory we have to populate them accordingly. Assuming the originally billing carrier knows the flight details best, we can follow the validation logic. Element 13/14 (origin/destination) are optional but in case they are used, they also have the validation that these must be equal to the original AWB billing. Assuming origin/destination of the originally billing carrier were incorrect based on our sales information how can we correct this detail? If we fill the fields with the adjusted values, the validation will fail. It cannot be the intention of SIS to leave these fields blank in this case and put the information in the remarks section. Please advise. Gudrun (LCAG)
|