Skip to main content

Test Home
You & IATA

Search

You are here: Home » Services » Financial Services » Simplified Interline Settlement » SIS Forums
  • Print this page
  • Share this page

Question to the Cargo RM HTML document

This is a read-only copy of the discussions. To view the original, where you can reply, go here. For info on how to log in, please see the instructions.

Created by Gudrun G (Lufthansa Cargo) on 2012-05-31 08:45:42 Back to Topics

Question to the Cargo RM HTML document

Dear all,
we have two questions concerning the contents of a Cargo RM in html format:

1. As per User Guide, Cargo chapter 2.2.13 Adding Prepaid AWB for RM, screen Add Prepaid AWB a complete AWB number has to be entered as follows:

  • AWB issuing airline (mandatory) = valid prefix/accounting code like 221 for WI
  • AWB Serial Number & Check Digit (mandatory)= should be 8 characters long.

Meanwhile we were billed with several RMs and the html documents are showing no 'AWB issuing airline' code and the AWB serial number has 7 characters only, no check digit. After an investigation we know the complete AWB number.

2. Is there any plausibility check when entering a value in the fields 'Your billing Year/...month/...period' concerning to the current billing year/month/period in which the RM is issued? On our received RM the values are the same which does not correspond with the reality.
 
Please advise.
 
We are awaiting your soonest response.
Thank you and best regards, Gudrun (LCAG)
Replied by Gudrun G (Lufthansa Cargo) on 2012-06-08 07:43:28
Hello again to Montreal,
this is a kind reminder - please respond to our mail.
Kind regards, Gudrun (LCAG)


From:
Posted: 5/31/2012 8:45 AM
Subject: Question to the Cargo RM HTML document

Dear all,
we have two questions concerning the contents of a Cargo RM in html format:

1. As per User Guide, Cargo chapter 2.2.13 Adding Prepaid AWB for RM, screen Add Prepaid AWB a complete AWB number has to be entered as follows:

  • AWB issuing airline (mandatory) = valid prefix/accounting code like 221 for WI
  • AWB Serial Number & Check Digit (mandatory)= should be 8 characters long.

Meanwhile we were billed with several RMs and the html documents are showing no 'AWB issuing airline' code and the AWB serial number has 7 characters only, no check digit. After an investigation we know the complete AWB number.

2. Is there any plausibility check when entering a value in the fields 'Your billing Year/...month/...period' concerning to the current billing year/month/period in which the RM is issued? On our received RM the values are the same which does not correspond with the reality.
 
Please advise.
 
We are awaiting your soonest response.
Thank you and best regards, Gudrun (LCAG)
Replied by Ashley H on 2012-06-13 17:49:35

Dear Gudrun,

 

We have created a SIS Help Desk case for this as this relates to real data in the SIS system. Please can you also supplement your case with that value that are not the same in your RM? Please send the supplementary info directly to sisoperations@iata.org.

 

Thanks,

Ashley

 

From: Gudrun Gewert
Posted At: May-31-12 8:46 AM
Posted To: SIS Forums - Record Structures
Conversation: Question to the Cargo RM HTML document
Subject: Question to the Cargo RM HTML document

 

Dear all,

we have two questions concerning the contents of a Cargo RM in html format:

1. As per User Guide, Cargo chapter 2.2.13 Adding Prepaid AWB for RM, screen Add Prepaid AWB a complete AWB number has to be entered as follows:

  • AWB issuing airline (mandatory) = valid prefix/accounting code like 221 for WI
  • AWB Serial Number & Check Digit (mandatory)= should be 8 characters long.

Meanwhile we were billed with several RMs and the html documents are showing no 'AWB issuing airline' code and the AWB serial number has 7 characters only, no check digit. After an investigation we know the complete AWB number.

2. Is there any plausibility check when entering a value in the fields 'Your billing Year/...month/...period' concerning to the current billing year/month/period in which the RM is issued? On our received RM the values are the same which does not correspond with the reality.

 

Please advise.

 

We are awaiting your soonest response.

Thank you and best regards, Gudrun (LCAG)

 
ADVERTISEMENT


Additional information

© International Air Transport Association (IATA) 2014. All rights reserved.