SIRM Insights
Topics from the Safety Issue Review Meetings
Picture_RVSM and LHD.jpg
  • SIRM AFI
  • CFIT
  • MAC
23 November 2023

Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM) and Large Height Deviations (LHD)

SIRM AFI - Reduced Vertical Separation Minima (RVSM) and Large Height Deviations (LHD)

Threat

For the aviation community Large Height Deviations (LHD) events pose the worst credible outcome of Mid-Air Collision (MAC). Whilst mitigations were introduced to reduce the outcome, such as Airborne Collision Alerting Systems (ACAS) and Short-Term Conflict Alerts (STCA) the risk is still, nevertheless, present. Examining and managing pre-cursor events is key to continued safety improvements and provides measures to assess the strength and effectiveness of Operator controls.  LHDs are occurring on a global level, with significant numbers of events in the Americas and Africa regions, the reasons for such events are numerous, but could include:

Identified Hazards

  • Human Factors (e.g., ATCO induced error, Pilot error, workload etc.)
  • Turbulence
  • Equipment Failures
  • Coordination issues between Flight Information Regions (FIR)

Data available indicates that the most common causes of LHD are related to Pilot or ATCO human factors, which may include errors in the communication of flight levels, the allocation of an incorrect level, or issues in the maintenance, arrival or departure of an assigned flight level. It is these most common error types which should be considered by industry SMS to ensure that appropriate safeguards and checks are in place to mitigate the threat of LHDs.

So where does RVSM fit into the LHD and associated risk picture? The RVSM approval status of aircraft is tracked as part of the LHD mitigation strategy, aircraft operating between Flight Level (FL) 290 and FL 410 are subject to reduced separation criteria and therefore should be RVSM approved to operate under such conditions. The Regional Monitoring Agencies (RMA) are responsible for monitoring and tracking RVSM approval status and for the height monitoring functions, which are conducted through Height Monitoring Units (HMU). Operators are responsible for ensuring that the aircraft in their fleet which are RVSM approved are height monitored at regular intervals (ICAO ANNEX 6 Part1). Failure to comply with the height monitoring conditions could increase the risk of LHD and from the Operator perspective could lead to a withdrawal of the RVSM approval. To ensure that continued improvements in safety are realised, positive reporting of LHD events must improve, this will enable the accurate assessment of “hot spots” and build awareness for the aviation community.  

Call to Action - Industry  

  • All appropriate LHD reports should be forwarded to the relevant RMA for tracking and ongoing risk assessment.
  • Reviewing available data, Operators should consider strengthening controls related to LHD “in-flight” categories, (LHD codes A and B particularly):

 LHD CODE

TLHD Code Description
A Fail to climb/descend the aircraft as cleared.
B Climb/descent without ATC clearance.
C Incorrect operation or interpretation of airborne equipment (e.g., incorrect operation of fully functional FMS, incorrect transcription of ATC clearance or re-clearance, flight plan followed rather than ATC clearance, original clearance followed instead of re-clearance, etc.)
D ATC system loop error (e.g., ATC issues incorrect clearance or flight crew misunderstands clearance messages)
E Coordination errors in the ATC to ATC transfer or control responsibility as a result of human factors issues (e.g., late or non-existent coordination, incorrect time estimate/actual, flight level, ATS route, etc., not in accordance with agreed parameters)
F Coordination errors in the ATC to ATC transfer or control responsibility as a result of equipment outage or technical issues.
G Deviation due to aircraft contingency event leading to sudden inability to maintain assigned flight level (e.g., pressurisation failure, engine failure)
H Deviation due to airborne equipment failure leading to unintentional or undetected change of flight level
I Deviation due to turbulence or other weather related cause
J Deviation due to TCAS resolution advisory, flight crew correctly following the resolution advisory
K Deviation due to TCAS resolution advisory, flight crew incorrectly following the resolution advisory.
L An aircraft being provided with RVSM separation is not RVSM approved (e.g., flight plan indicating RVSM approval but aircraft not approved, ATC misinterpretation of flight plan)
M Other – this includes situations of flights operating (including climbing/descending) in airspace where flight crews are unable to establish normal air-ground communications with the responsible ATS unit.
  • Operators should ensure that all RVSM approved aircraft are subject to regular height monitoring.
  • Operators are encouraged to ensure risk mitigations are reviewed and strengthened to reduce the likelihood of such events.
  • ANSP providers are encouraged to identify LHD hotspots and identify causes, work with adjacent ANSPs, IATA and industry to mitigate LHD caused by communication/coordination issues.

Call to Action – IATA

  1. The Air Traffic Management Working Group (ATMWG) will review available LHD data to identify areas for IATA activity to improve mitigation strategy.
  2. IATA Regional Coordination Group for Safety & Flight Operations to continue to work with Regional Monitoring Agency and States to address ‘hotspot’ areas through mitigation measures.

 

Useful Links

  1. ICAO 9574
  2. ICAO 9937 – Includes a list of RMAs.
  3. RVSM Monitoring Groups
  4. Manual of Assessment for LHD

We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. We also use cookies for advertising purposes. Please see our privacy policy and cookies policy for complete information.